Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Marathon #11
Also, many thanks to Andrew who slept in but then found me at mile 23 and ran the last three miles with me! It definitely helped me keep up the pace (well, mile 25 was all uphill) and I lost count of how many guys I chicked. While wearing a skirt, no less :) Sorry, that sounds really cocky...but I'm usually the one getting passed at the end of a marathon, so it felt good to be the one doing the passing!
Here are my mile splits. Yes, the miles were accurately marked (they assured us before the race), and yes, mile 23 was my fastest (I'm totally sold on Roctane Gu! All 5 of my gels should have been this):
Mile 1 - 8:37 (very downhill)
Mile 2 - 9:01
Mile 3 - 9:06
Mile 4 - 8:51
Mile 5 - 8:46
Mile 6 - 9:03
Mile 7 - 8:47
Mile 8 - 8:59
Mile 9 - 8:56
Mile 10 - 8:58
Mile 11 - 9:17 (slight uphill)
Mile 12 - 9:13 (here too)
Mile 13 - 9:04
Mile 14 - 9:07
Mile 15 - 8:51
Mile 16 - 9:04
Mile 17 - 8:56
Mile 18 - 9:00
Mile 19 - 9:07
Mile 20 - 9:02
Mile 21 - 9:33
Mile 22 - 9:35
Mile 23 - 8:33 (thank you, Roctane Gu)
Mile 24 - 9:11
Mile 25 - 9:42 (very uphill)
Mile 26 - 9:02
Mile 0.2 - 1:51
So it was a good race, but I already have my eye on Marathon #12 - I'm thinking maybe Virginia Beach. I want to conquer this distance, dammit!
Monday, November 15, 2010
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Triple Lakes Trail Marathon Race Report!
Anyway, back to Triple Lakes - here are the 10 best - or maybe I should say "Most Notable" - things about this race:
10. I was running the marathon and NOT the concurrent 40 mile event.
9. Powerade at all the aid stations was just the right strength. Also, jelly beans at mile 20 totally hit the spot.
8. It was frickin cold at the 8 am start, which actually ended up being an 8:08 start. It took me a good 5 miles to warm up, hands to toes. I knew I'd be hot before long, so I tried to enjoy my shivering and goosebumps.
7. I am not sore at all. At all! As I type this it's been about 34 hours since I finished the race. Of all the marathons I've run, this is the quickest recovery I've ever had. It's taken me longer to recover from some of my training runs! This is good, because I'm supposed to run 22 miles in less than 2 weeks, ideally at 9 min/mile pace.
6. Maybe part of the reason I'm not sore is that the race was DEFINITELY not a full, honest 26.2 miles. I ran most of the race with Robert (more about that below), and around the mid-teen miles we were chatting about how the miles seemed to be passing quickly (they weren't really - our pace was steady, about 10:30 min/mile). I commented that usually it's mile 24 when I think those remaining 2.2 miles - which in any other situation are nothing at all - seem so daunting and painful. Robert reminded me of this comment when we passed the mile 24 marker, though we were both feeling good and not pushing hard, so 2.2 miles sounded fine. So imagine our surprise when less than 10 minutes later...it's the finish line! We heard cheering as we came out of the woods, and I thought it was one of those cruel tricks where they make you run near the finish line when you actually still have >1 mile left. But no. We emerged from the woods, ran around this little pond next to an open field, then followed flags up through the field where the spectator-lined finish line was right there, about 50 ft in front of us. People were cheering, the clock was ticking around 4:35 (my watch was around 4:28 at mile 24), and Robert and I were totally confused. So we STOPPED, right in front of the finish line and asked each other "did we miss a turn"? Robert was wearing his GPS, which said we only ran a bit over 24, and he wanted to go back to see if we accidentally cut the course. If I had been by myself, I probably would've just finished, but I agreed, and we turned around and cut back over to the part of the course before the pond loop. The spectators stopped cheering and were probably wondering "what the hell?!" But we saw all these other runners that we had passed earlier running the same way we had. We checked the arrow signs, tried to find race volunteers, but we just came across more spectators who told us we were going the right way - out of the woods and around the pond. So, we ran that portion of the course again and finished ~4:42. After the finish we asked race volunteers and other runners about the shortened course, and everyone just kind of shrugged their shoulders. No one else had seen mile 25 or 26, but no one else really cared. So the one marathon when I'm feeling strong and ready to take on those final 2.2...they're not there! Oh well. Okay, enough of #6. On to...
5. Beautiful lake-side scenery! This is only mid-way down the list because you had to spend more time looking at the ground to avoid tripping. Which brings me to...
4. I didn't fall or bleed! Though I guess I wouldn't have minded the latter because it's considered a badge of honor among trail runners. I saw plenty of other runners who did both, including one guy who scared a bunch of us when we came across him lying on the ground with blood all over his face. But it was near an aid station, and help showed up quickly (and he assured us he was fine).
3. There was a Krispy Creme shop only 5 miles from the race, right on the way back home! Boy, did a post-run glazed donut and bottle of milk hit the spot.

2. The AWESOMEST race shirt EVER! The finishers medal had the same design:
And the best thing about this race...
1. Running miles ~11-finish with fellow Godivan Robert Moody - thanks for the company, Robert! It totally made the miles fly by. Robert was also using this race as a practice marathon. His target event - Richmond marathon - is coming up even sooner than mine (his is Nov. 13, mine is Nov. 27). I think we'll both be ready!
All in all, this was a good race and I would run it again, especially given its proximity to Durham. I'm still a little dissatisfied about the shorten course, but at least I wasn't one of the two guys who I overheard at the beginning of the race telling each other that it was their first marathon!
Sunday, October 03, 2010
Alien kitteh!
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Shrimp
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Bird boarder
Sunday, July 18, 2010
California
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Pocono Lakes
Falls Lake is nice, but - dare I say it - the fieldwork is almost too easy with a motorized boat, milder climate, and less intensive research (which is of course my fault, despite my time constraints). Anyway, here are some photos I dug up of Lake Giles (first 4) and Lake Lacawac (last 2):



Tuesday, June 01, 2010
Flowering palm
As I was snapping these pictures, look who dropped by to hang out for about 12 seconds:
Friday, May 14, 2010
Madeline's famous!

How awesome is that! I didn't think it was a very good picture because I took it through the glass door and you can't see Madeline's features very well. This network of websites gets 10,000 photo and video submissions a day and millions of unique visitors. Madeline was not enthused when I initially told her the good news, although she cheered a little when I broke out the cat treats to celebrate!
Lounging next to or even under the grill (see below) is one of Madeline's new favorite spots. I guess it's better than some of her other outdoor hangouts, like in between the garbage cans!
Monday, May 10, 2010
Stupid laws
Friday, May 07, 2010
Salmon cakes with mango-lime salsa
Wow, was this yummy! I ate two of them. We'll see how this keeps as leftovers - I made the whole 4 serving recipe (actually made 5 little cakes). But of course even after two dinner servings and chips & salsa appetizers I still had room for dessert. I MADE room for dessert because while I was shopping for dinner stuff at Kings Red & White (this cute little family-owned grocery just a 10 min walk away from my house) I was THRILLED to see Jell-O Pudding Pops in the ice cream section!!!!!! Does anyone else remember these? These were my favorite summertime treat as a kid. It was hard to decide whether vanilla, chocolate, or swirl was my favorite. These Jell-O pudding pops I found today were in a bright yellow Popsicles box, and I did not recall them being manufactured by Popsicles. I decided to do some careful Google research, and this is what I found. Indeed, it's true - these are most definitely NOT the same treats as yesteryear. I had a swirl one and it wasn't even swirled at all! It was chocolate in the center, vanilla on the outside. There was no frozen outer shell, and they are shaped like fudgesicles, not the old-time Jell-O pudding pops. It was tasty, but not the same. Oh well.
Another find from Kings was ice cream from Maple View Farms. You know it's a local product when there's no nutrition info label on it (and when it comes to ice cream, ignorance is bliss)! This dairy farm is right next door in Orange County. They had a range of flavors available at Kings, and I decided to try Carolina Crunch (yes, I had two desserts. I'm glad I like running). It is delicious!
But what was the sweetest part of my meal this evening? Listening to 47-year-old Jamie Moyer pitch an absolutely amazing shutout for the Phillies against the Braves! Oldest pitcher in the MLB to pitch a shutout!!!!!!!!!!!
Friday, April 30, 2010
Soft-shelled crabs
I prepared the three smaller crabs first and then did the larger one, which was more lively.
I breaded them with seasoned flour and cornmeal and sauteed them in butter:
Lastly, I slapped it on a whole wheat kaiser roll with lettuce, tomato, and mayo:
It was a little crunchier and juicer than I expected (I don't think I cleaned them as well as I should have) but yum! I cooked and ate two of them and froze two of them. On the Walking Fish website it said it was okay to freeze them, but we'll see how the frozen ones do.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Science Catfight
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Science Catfight - Joe Bastardi vs. Brenda Ekwurzel | ||||
| www.colbertnation.com | ||||
| ||||
Updates
On a completely unrelated note, it's April 28 - time to ask myself how I'm doing with my New Year's Resolutions (you totally thought I forgot, didn't you).
These were my three primary resolutions:
- Run hill repeats at least once every two weeks.
- Do strength training for at least 30 minutes a week (and my weekly ballet class doesn't count toward this).
- Floss way more often.
These were my secondary resolutions:
- Run at least 30 miles a week to exceed 1500 miles for 2010.
- No computer or TV after 10 pm.
- Bedtime by 11 pm at the latest.
- Bike to work more often.
- Read more, watch TV and web surf less.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Happy Earth Day!
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Speaking of climate change skeptics...

Up or down? Paleoclimatologist Håkan Grudd says his temperature graph (red) doesn't match one drawn by Claude Allègre (black). Caption and picture published in the 9 April 2010 issue of Science.
Yes, it's true - this dude's book actually includes hand-drawn graphs of made-up data. Are you kidding me? Allegre must have some balls thinking he can twist around other scientists' data to fit whatever he wants it to say - and think that said scientists wouldn't notice this and call him out on it?! So yeah, nice job, Allegre - thanks for communicating loud and clear how you deniers operate.
Tuesday, April 06, 2010
Queer the census
Thursday, April 01, 2010
Skeptical Science website
Here's what it says in the "About" section of the website:
The goal of Skeptical Science is to explain what peer reviewed science has to say about global warming. When you peruse the many arguments of global warming skeptics, a pattern emerges. Skeptic arguments tend to focus on narrow pieces of the puzzle while neglecting the broader picture. For example, focus on Climategate emails neglects the full weight of scientific evidence for man-made global warming. Concentrating on a few growing glaciers ignores the world wide trend of accelerating glacier shrinkage. Claims of global cooling fail to realise the planet as a whole is still accumulating heat. This website presents the broader picture by explaining the peer reviewed scientific literature.
Often, the reason for disbelieving in man-made global warming seem to be political rather than scientific. Eg - "it's all a liberal plot to spread socialism and destroy capitalism". As one person put it, "the cheerleaders for doing something about global warming seem to be largely the cheerleaders for many causes of which I disapprove". However, what is causing global warming is a purely scientific question. Skeptical Science removes the politics from the debate by concentrating solely on the science.
As someone who is terribly passionate about clear, accurate, and effective communication of science, I wholeheartedly endorse this idea of separating the science from the politics, even while realizing that ideally we do need the former to guide the latter.






