Sunday, April 20, 2008

Here is a perfect example...

...of the Bush administration's dismissive, careless anti-environmental policies and cocky, unconstitutional above-the-law attitude. This goddamn border fence is just as illegal as, if not more illegal than, the immigration it is supposed to prevent. I do not know how many specific laws there are prohibiting illegal entry into the United States. But according to this article, the Bush administration has "waived more than 30 environmental and land-management laws" in its hurried determination to build this disaster to wildlife. The DHS spokeswoman is quoted as saying, "For a number of miles, we've determined that it would have only insignificant impact." Bullshit. We all know that the administration, Congress, Senate, and other government asses have no clue about the importance of plant and wildlife dispersal and migration, habitat fragmentation, inbreeding depression, keystone species concept, and other relevant aspects of community ecology, and they won't listen to those scientists who do know about such things. The DHS spokeswoman further proves this point by saying that the fence could actually help the environment by reducing trash by border-crossing immigrants! Does she think the American people, especially us environmentalists, are idiots? This is even more ridiculous than the whole cutting-down-trees-to-prevent-forest-fires gimmick. Can you picture a bunch of Mexicans LITTERING as they attempt to sneak stealthily over the border? I commend those brave scientists who are so outraged that they actually plan to lay in front of the bulldozers, and I commend the Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife for taking this issue to court. Thankfully, there are only 274 days left in the Bush dictatorship. However, I'm honestly not sure how much better Obama, Clinton, or McCain would be on this issue. They all voted for the initial bill, but I don't know if they favor the waiver of environmental laws. Those of us who care enough will have to write letters and lobby our representatives and new President for a plan that is not environmentally destructive, more cost-efficient, and more effective at addressing the root of the immigration issue.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

They do litter! Big Time! Funny, I came up with that argument independently of the DHS people.
I still am not sure how this would be an environmental catastrophe. it really has to be less than the litter and pollution. Here's a scientific article discussing the littering:
The Professional Geographer Volume 54 Issue 3 Page 392-405, August 2002.
CG